A compelling case exists that for many newspapers to survive, they'll require nonprofit status -- and possibly public funding. A related question is where TV and radio journalism might fit into that equation.
Watching newspapers die in alarming numbers, respected journalists and academics are rallying to the cause of "saving" print. "Nonprofit" has become a buzzword, buttressed in part by the recent Pulitzer Prize awarded to ProPublica. Others have gone farther by advocating public support, as
During a recent forum at
As unlikely as it sounds, there's reason to wonder, too, if financing schemes might be necessary to promote hard news in television.
Clearly, a "let the marketplace decide" approach isn't yielding anything close to the level of journalism that purists and critics advocate. Instead, too much TV operates in a zone where TMZ increasingly sets the agenda, where the prevailing mind-set often seems to be, "There was a nuclear summit, but first, the latest on
Although TV's financial situation isn't as ostentatiously dire as print's, from a qualitative standpoint, television is even worse off. Cash-strapped stations have slashed news budgets, and networks are scaling back on expensive international coverage and bureaus.
A sizable majority of media execs say news is headed in the wrong direction in the latest
Bastions of serious news are shrinking, and most of the best exist outside the ad-supported realm.
Beyond their nightly newscasts, the major networks are increasingly dominated by fluff, celebrity and scandal on their ascendant morning shows and crime-saturated newsmagazines. Fox News Channel and MSNBC rely on studio-bound talk formats that call for minimal reporting, while
In many respects, cable resembles the paper-thin journalism of local news, minus weather and sports scores. As Nichols noted, during dozens of book-related events around the U.S., doubtless over-populated by egghead academic types, "not one person" claimed to be satisfied with their local coverage.
Although it would seem that public support would be a political nonstarter, Nichols and McChesney maintain that some lawmakers recognize the fundamental threat to democracy (with a small "d") as journalism withers. The issue of financing also arose at UC Berkeley's annual Logan Symposium on Investigative Reporting, where discussion included viable models for in-depth journalism in the U.S. and abroad.
Deep cuts to newspapers already have resulted in questionable solutions to staffing shortages. As the
According to McChesney, the evaporation of classified advertising and emergence of the Web merely exposed "the myth that journalism was naturally a commercial enterprise." What's clear, he said, is that in the current climate, "There isn't sufficient money to give us the journalism we need," estimating an 11-figure price tag --
Based on the political winds and popularity of media-bashing in those circles, it's hard to envision government liberating billions to support and sustain a vibrant press.
Still, any serious debate about salvaging journalism must consider the role of television, which for most people remains the most pervasive source of news. Because while newspapers are poor, in its own way, TV is downright impoverished.
- Television - Network News Doing Less with Less
- Fox - White House Media War is Killing News
- TV News Sensationalism: Everything Is Suspect
- Television - Chattin' It up With iCarly's Miranda Cosgrove
- Television - Can TV News Be Saved?
- Television - Recurring Reality's Faux Sheen
- America Through the Reality Lens
- Television - TV Vets Assess Sitcoms
- Ultimate HDTV HD Television Buying Guide
- Decade of Rapid Change
- TV's Best for 2009: Can't Pick Just 10
- Behind the Scenes at the Food Network
(c) 2010 Variety. Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.