Revisiting Wilson's 'Truly Disadvantaged'
Twenty-five years after sociologist
Wilson, then a
Wilson blamed the decline of post-World War II industrial America and the evaporation of the good-paying jobs. Without the resources that had enabled two-parent families to sustain themselves, inner cities were left with a new largely dependent "underclass."
Memorably, the book introduced such new terms as "marriageable men" to describe the shortage of men who were capable economically and otherwise to make good husbands. Even if you agree with social conservatives, as I do, about the importance of two-parent families, efforts to improve the supply of marriageable men have fallen woefully short of demand.
That message echoed at a conference sponsored by the
The good news: Children on welfare dropped to their lowest level in 30 years after welfare reform was passed, helped by the era's economic boom. The bad news, Wilson said at the Century forum, is that the "underclass" is still with us, although the word has fallen out of political correctness in many circles.
"There is little wrong with our 'underclass' that a little time and a lot of jobs would not cure" I wrote in a column shortly after "The Truly Disadvantaged" was published. I have since expanded that view. Culture matters, too, I have realized. It doesn't do any good to offer some people a job if their values don't lead them to take it. That concerns Wilson, too. At the conference, he and other policy experts explored the importance of "neighborhood effects" that can undermine values and incentives to, for example, pack up and move to where jobs might be more available.
Wilson credited welfare reform and the robust economy of the 1990s with reducing underclass poverty, but noted that poverty has rebounded since 2000. The dip in the 1990s might prove to be only a "blip" in the long-term decline of concentrated poverty communities, he said.
Black prison incarceration also has increased, putting even more of a chill on black incomes, family life and "marriageable men."
"Quite frankly I think that Obama's programs have prevented poverty, including concentrated poverty, from rapidly rising, considering the terrible economy," Wilson said. He included Obama's stimulus package, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which earmarked
It included such emergency benefits as an extension of unemployment benefits, a temporary increase in the earned income-tax credit and additional funds for Food Stamps. It also offered
Taken together, Wilson said, Obama's programs exceed the spending on low-income Americans by of any of the six previous presidents. Now, given all of this action during Obama's first term, in terms of addressing problems of concentrated poverty, Wilson concluded in his prepared remarks, "which presidential candidate would you take your chances on?" Which one, indeed.
Neither side has all the answers in our national poverty debate. But we need to at least talk about it, before we make bad matters worse.
Read the latest political news.
- A Memo to Mitt and Ann Romney
- Mitt Romney's Biggest Problem is His Own Party
- Mitt Romney Can Win By Doing One Thing
- Mitt Romney on the Spot
- Presidential Debates Present Opportunity and Peril for Mitt Romney
- The Presidential Debate: Look for the Plans, Not the Puns
- His Campaign Sliding, Mitt Romney Must Deliver in Debate
- The 'Self-Made' Hallucination of America's Rich
- Why Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are Going Down
- Four Reasons Why Mitt Romney Might Still Win
- America Needs Good Refs -- On the Gridiron and in Politics
- How the GOP Protects Its Falsehoods
- 2012 Election Could Mirror 1980 Race
- A GOP Civil War Simmers
- Mitt Romney Missed Big Chance with Latino Voters
- Mitt Romney's Losing Bid to Win the Latino Vote
- Does Political Discourse Need Geneva Conventions?
- Another Episode in Mitt Romney's Foreign Policy Follies
- Team Romney Doubles Down
- In Defense of the 47 Percent
- The High Cost of Mitt Romney's Candor
- It was a privilege, Mitt Romney
- The Obama Hare and Romney the Tortoise
- An American Shame that Both Candidates Ignore
- Revisiting Wilson's 'Truly Disadvantaged'
- The Poor: America's Forgotten Swing Voters
- Pragmatic Racism
- Mitt Romney's Taxes: Who Cares?
- Waffling on Obamacare will Not Help Mitt Romney
- Why They Call Bill Clinton 'Big Dog'
- Bill Clinton's Secret: Make Little Words Matter
- Bill Clinton Delivers
- Forward to What, Democrats?
- The New Obama Shows Muscle
- Words of Wisdom from a Nun
- Likable Mitt Romney
- Mitt Romney Misjudges Voters
- Mitt Romney's Troubling Pattern
- Mitt Romney's Party -- Checks OK, iPhones Not
- Distractions and Diversions
- The Self-Immolation of Mitt Romney
- The Latest Battle in the War on Voting
- Better Off Today? Don't Ask
- What has Obama Learned?
- Obama Sells Old Ideas as New
- Let George W Bush Be
- Do We Want This Foolish Man?
- Poor Visibility
- Paul Ryan Runs Into the Truth
- Team Romney's War Against Facts
- Both Parties Go to Extremes
- Candidates Have De-Emphasized Foreign Affairs
- Campaign 2012 in a Nutshell: Wrong Ideas vs No Ideas
- Memo to GOP: Demography is Destiny
- Tribe of Liberty
- The Price of Freedom
- Paul Ryan Calling the Kettle Black with Medicare Scare Tactics
- House of Representatives Armed with Irony
- Obama Leads Romney in Post-Conventions Poll
- Character, Policy and the Selection of Leaders
- The Politicization of Violence
- The Selling of American Democracy: The Perfect Storm
- Losing Latino Votes
- The Party is Over: Longtime GOPer Dissects Modern Political Landscape
- Paul Ryan's Faux Populism
- Rise Up, Middle Class, Rise Up!
- A Modest Proposal: Three Weeks of Paid Vacation
- The Paul Ryan Choice
Revisiting Wilson's 'Truly Disadvantaged' | Politics
(c) 2012 Tribune Media Services, Inc