Democrats Push for Filibuster Rule Change
Alex M. Parker
Some want to change the way filibusters work after what they see as too much obstruction
As the 111th Congress came to a close, Democrats were hailing the past two years as among the most productive in the legislature's history.
But they were also blasting what they describe as unprecedented obstruction from the Republican opposition, which delayed the passage of major bills and left others in the dustbin. As lawmakers enjoyed the short holiday break, Democratic senators quietly pushed for procedural reform, especially in regard to the filibuster, a parliamentary tactic in the Senate that extends debate on a bill in order to avoid a final vote. Reformers see a clear road ahead because of a little-known option for changing the rules. But as always with Congress, the devil is in the details.
In late December, Senate Democrats sent a letter to Majority Leader Harry Reid urging him to take up reform in the new Congress, although it didn't mention any specifics. Many reformers want the Senate to explore the so-called constitutional option, which would, in theory, allow the Senate to bypass the normal 67-vote requirement for a rule change and set new rules with a simple majority and the support of the vice president, who also serves as president of the Senate.
Senators have debated the constitutional option for decades, but have never directly used it. That's because the mere threat is enough for parties to come to a compromise using established procedures. But its time may have come. "Those of us that think the Senate is broken believe that this is the way to get reform," says New Mexico Sen. Tom Udall , a Democrat who proposed the reforms.
According to parliamentary experts, the Senate can probably employ the constitutional option to change Senate rules at any time it wants, but reformers have been emphasizing that a rule change as the Senate begins would be the most orderly route. It doesn't appear there's much support for eliminating the filibuster or reducing the 60-vote threshold needed to overcome one. Rather, senators are looking at requiring those wishing to hold up legislation to debate it on the floor, like the old-fashioned filibuster seen in the classic movie Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. Today, senators can filibuster even if they're not on the floor. "When you have a vote, and 41 senators say that they want to have additional debate, then we'll have additional debate," Udall says. Other reforms Udall has suggested include prohibiting anonymous holds, which allow a single senator to hold up a bill or nomination without making it public. Udall says that he doesn't think there are enough senators to support the constitutional option yet, but that momentum is growing.
Congressional experts wonder whether the Senate will have the gumption to go through with it and whether the reforms would ultimately matter. Sarah Binder, a constitutional scholar at the Brookings Institution, says it isn't clear that requiring physical filibusters would cut down on the tactic. "On some issues, the minority will relish the spotlight and be willing to pay the costs of holding the floor," she says.
With filibuster use at an all-time high, don't expect this debate to go away in the upcoming Congress.
Read the latest political news.
Available at Amazon.com:
- Obama Faces the Same Problems in 2011
- GOP's John Boehner Gets House Speaker's Gavel
- Good Teen Pals = Good Politics?
- Boehner, Pelosi, Haley, Ryan and Others to Watch in 2011
- New Era of Bipartisanship in 2011? No Chance
- Congress to Tackle Healthcare and Filibuster Rules
- Democrats Push for Filibuster Rule Change
- Republicans Charge Harry Reid Power Grab on Filibuster
- Lame Duck Session Was Successful For The President's Party
- Constitutionalists vs. 'Interpretationists'
- 2010 Midterm Elections Set Campaign Spending Records
- Biden Hints at Obama Reelection Themes
- Obama's Toughest Year Ahead?
- How Obama Is Failing at the Dramatic Side of the Presidency
- The Founding Fathers: Religion and God
- Ham-and-Egg Justice
- Obama's Hawaii Vacation Is Revealing
- Like Sarah Palin Early Feminists Were Pro-Life
- They're Back! The Return of the Death Panels
- Don't Reignite 'Death Panel' Insanity
- Sarah Palin: She Told Us So
- Why the Rich Are Getting Richer
- A Far From Happy New Year
- The American 21st Century
- Defense Is On The Table
- A Leaner and Meaner Defense
- The Political Power of Social Media
- The Good News About Gas
- Post-Census Party-Pooping
- The Would-be GOP Kings
- Generation Next
- Every Man a King
- Believe in Violence and Be Saved
- Inside the Tea Party Revolution
- John Boehner, Sarah Palin and When Crying Is OK in Politics
- Obama and Clinton Share Personality Traits
- Grand Compromise Brings More Spending
- Barack Obama: The New Comeback Kid
- Swimming in Blessings; Drowning in Complaints
- Time for the 2010 Freeby Awards
- A Reliable Prediction
- The Year Washington Became 'Business-Friendly'
- South American Diary
- Obama's Pending Assignment: Reconnecting With Hispanics and Latin America
- Our Government has Become Greedy
- When Will Obama Go 'Gangster'
- Transcending Progressive Discord
- John Boehner's Curious Tears
- A Tractable and Pragmatic President
- The President's Tax Deal Is Just More Trickle-Down Economics
- President Obama: A Decent Deal, a Weak Sales Job
- Questions for Democrats
- The American Jobs Emergency Requires Action
- Why Not Soak the Rich?
- President Obama Takes on the Liberal Democrats
- President Obama's Surrender
- Reigniting the Spirit of 2008
- Learning the Constitution Is Essential for Americans
- Obama-Clinton's Tag Team Show
- Behind Bill Clinton's Smile
- Obama Tax Deal Debate Is a Classic Beltway Christmas Story
- Voters Say Obama Has No Clear Narrative
- When Words Fail
- 10 Senate Democrats Targeted for Defeat in 2012
- Senators Amass Campaign War Chests Ahead of 2012
- Redefining the Global Warming Debate
- The Need to Protect Our Aging Workforce
- First They Came for My Twinkie ...
- More Nixon Wisdom
- Politics Without Labels? What a Silly Concept
- No Backslide for House Ethics
- Obamacare in Critical Condition
- The Death of Health Care Reform
- Sarah Palin's Economy
- In a Giving Mood But Only Toward Rich
- Congress Must Help Struggling Families Not Millionaires
Democrats Push for Filibuster Rule Change | Politics
(c) 2011 U.S. News & World Report