Obama's First Stand
Let's hope the president holds his ground on not extending the Bush tax cuts to the richest Americans -- who don't need it, don't deserve it, and won't help the economy if they get it.
But instead of limiting his proposed extension to
The real explosion of income and wealth has occurred in the top 1 percent.
Between 2002 and 2007, the bottom 99 percent of incomes grew 1.3 percent a year in real terms, while incomes of top 1 percent grew 10 percent a year. During these years the top 1 percent accounted for two-thirds of all income growth.
Over the last three decades the top 1 percent's share of national income has more than doubled.
So there's no reason the top 1 percent should continue to get the Bush tax cut. The top 1 percent spends a much smaller proportion of their income than everyone else. That means there's very little economic stimulus at these lofty heights.
Giving them a two-year extension would cost the Treasury
Conservative supply-siders who argue that the top 1 percent will stop working as hard if they have to return to the 39 percent marginal rate of the Clinton years must be smoking something (probably an expensive grade). Incomes in the top 1 percent are just about the only ones that are now rising. (
Besides, the Clinton years weren't exactly bad years, economically, for the top 1 percent. They did wonderfully well then, too.
And the Bush tax cuts never trickled down. To the contrary, between 2001 and 2007, the median wage dropped. And Bush's record on jobs was pitiful.
The politics are even clearer. Over the next two years, Obama must clarify for the nation whose side he's on and whose side his Republican opponents are on. What better issue to begin with than this one?
Inequality continues to widen in America. But an especially wide chasm has opened between the upper middle class -- including lawyers, doctors and small-business owners -- who earn up to
The political power of this top 1 percent is evident in everything from hedge-fund and private-equity-fund managers who can treat their incomes as capital gains (subject to a 15 percent tax) to multimillion-dollar home interest deductions on executive mansions.
If the president can't or won't take a stand against more benefits for these privileged few -- when he still has a chance to prevail in the lame-duck
Available at Amazon.com:
Read the latest political news.
- The Bashing of American Exceptionalism
- Coercive Diplomacy That Went Wrong
- Dubya's Worst Moment
- The Party of Organized Money
- Time to Decide What Congress Is For
- Throw Nancy Pelosi Overboard!
- Obama's Blind Side
- Comparisons Between Obama and Dictators Horribly Misguided
- Democratic Finger-Pointing and Obama's 2012 Comeback
- 10 Reasons Obama Is Floundering
- Trouble Ahead for Obama's Presidency
- Obama Cannot Play Center
- America's Love Affair With Obama Is Over
- Both Parties Need to Wise Up
- 2010 Elections: After the Fall
- Political Reporters Look Ahead to 2012 Presidential Election
- Is Sarah Palin's Alaska a 2012 Campaign Ad?
- Support for Sarah Palin Declines
- Groups Prep for Pricey 2012 Presidential Campaign
- The George W. Bush Fixation
- Bush Tax Cuts: How Washington is Making the Rich Richer
- Flood of Campaign Spending Was Good for 2010 Elections
- 4 Billion in Election Spending a Drop in the Bucket
- America Checks Into Rehab
- Jefferson and Madison's Constitution and Modern Gridlock
- GOP Stars to Take Over Congressional Committees
- Obama's First Stand
- Using the Lame Duck Session
- The Right Way to Reform Healthcare
- The Coming 'Monstrosity' Battle
- The Politics of Budget-Cutting
- Michele Bachmann's Plan to Fix the Economy
- Time Machine
- Battle Over Earmarks: Much Ado About Nothing
- Achieve Balanced Federal Budget Through Spending Restraint
- Unemployment Trumps the Budget Deficit
- America's Two Economies: Why One Is Recovering and the Other Isn't
Obama's First Stand | Politics
(c) 2010 Robert Reich